Guide for Authors

(Type of the paper between brackets: Original Research Articles, Technical note, View point, Review article, etc.)

Title

First name Last name 1, First name Last name 2, First name Last name 2,*

1   Affiliation 1; e-mail@e-mail.com

2   Affiliation 2; e-mail@e-mail.com

*   Correspondence: e-mail@e-mail.com; Tel.: (optional; include country code; if there are multiple corresponding authors, add author initials).

ARTICLE INFORMATION:

Received: Day Month Year, Received in revised form Day Month Year

Accepted: Day Month Year, Available online Day Month Year

ABSTRACT:

Abstract section composed of a single paragraph of no more than 200 words. Abstracts for research articles should provide a concise description of the work. We strongly encourage scientists to write organized abstracts in the following format, but without headings: (1) Background: Set the question in context and emphasize the objective of the investigation. (2) Procedures: briefly detail the major methods or treatments used; (3) Results: summarize the key conclusions of the article; (4) Conclusions: state the key findings or interpretations. The abstract should be an objective description of the paper, with no outcomes that are not reported and substantiated in the main body and no exaggeration of the primary conclusions.

Keywords: keyword 1; keyword 2; keyword 3 (List three to five keywords specific to the article)

1. Introduction:

The study should be briefly described in the beginning along with its significance. It should explain the relevance of the work as well as its main goals. Key papers should be referenced, and a thorough analysis of the state of the research area should be conducted. When appropriate, please emphasize disputable and divergent theories. Finally, briefly discuss the work's main goals and highlight its key findings. Please try to make the introduction understandable to scientists who aren't in your field of study. References need to be listed as follows: 1) single author: the author's name (without initials, unless there is ambiguity) and the year of publication; 2) two authors: both authors' names and the year of publication and 3) three or more authors: first author's name followed by 'et al.' and the year of publication.  Groups of references can be listed either first alphabetically, then chronologically, or vice versa. For example: (Abdelhafez et al., 2020); (Ali and Jone, 2022); (Abdelhafez 2020a; 2020b; Mansour et al., 2021).

2. Materials and Methods:

Materials and Methods should be detailed sufficiently with more clarity. Note that publishing your manuscript requires you to share all materials, data, computer code and procedures with readers. Please mention material or information restrictions at submission. New procedures and protocols should be detailed, whereas established methods can be simply discussed and mentioned. Research publications presenting huge datasets placed in a publicly available database should include the database and accession numbers. Please indicate that accession numbers will be given during review if they are not yet available. Provide them before publishing. Interventional animal, human or plants research and other ethically approved experiments must indicate the ethical approval authority and code.

3. Results and Discussions:

It's possible to break up this section with certain subheadings. It should include a clear, succinct, and accurate summary of the experimental data, their interpretation and the implications that can be taken from the investigation. In addition, the authors should describe the results and how they might be interpreted taking into account both the findings of past research and the hypotheses that were being tested at the experimental time. It is important to describe both the results and the consequences of those findings in the broadest possible context. It's also possible to indicate potential future study directions.

Authors should present their numerical values with standard units; for example it’s necessary to use the unit of (mg kg-1) rather than using the unit of (mg/kg).

3.1. Subsection (Subsection should be presented in italic form)

3.1.1. Sub-subsection (Sub-subsection should be presented without italic form)

The text continues here.

Figures and Tables:

All figures and tables should be cited in the main text as Figure 1, Table 1, etc.

Figure 1. The Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt.

Table 1. Tables should be placed in the main text near to the first time they are cited.

Treatments

N, %

P, mg kg-1

K mg kg-1

Chlorophyll A, mg g-1 fresh weight

Chlorophyll B, mg g-1 fresh weight

A

--

--

--

--

--

B

--

--

--

--

--

C

--

--

--

--

--

Average

--

--

--

--

--

1 Tables may have footer (Time new roman 11 font size).

The text continues here.

Formatting of Mathematical Components

Please submit math equations as editable text and not as images. Present simple formulae in line with normal text where possible. This is example 1 of an equation:

An equation need not be followed by a new paragraph of text. Equations should be punctuated like ordinary text.  For example “where, C0 is the concentration of the applied metal ions and Ce is the metal ions concentration at equilibrium, respectively.

This is example 2 of an equation:

Please follow the same as in equation (1)

4. Conclusions:

The main findings of the research may be summarized in a concise Conclusions section, which can either function as an independent part or as a subsection of the Results and Discussion section. Describe the one-of-a-kind contributions made as well as the significance of those contributions here.

Author Contributions:

Multiple authors on a research publication are required to each have their contributions to the work outlined in a brief paragraph. Use the following acknowledgment statements: "Conceptualization, A.A. and B.B.; methodology, C.C.; software, D.D.; validation, E.E., F.F., and G.G.; formal analysis, H.H.; investigation, I.I. ; resources, J.J. ; data curation, K.K.; writing -initial draft preparation, L.L.; writing, reviewing and editing, M.M. The final paper has been reviewed and approved by all authors.

Acknowledgments:

In this part, you will have the opportunity to recognize any help that was provided but was not addressed in the sections on author contributions or financing. This might take the form of help in administrative and technical areas or gifts in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments). In addition funding

Conflicts of Interest:

Declare conflicts of interest or state “The authors declare no conflict of interest.” Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interest that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results.

References:

References must be presented (including citations in tables and legends) and listed individually at the end of the manuscript following HARVAD style. We recommend preparing the references with a bibliography software package, such as EndNote, Reference Manager or Zotero to avoid typing mistakes and duplicated references. In addition, authors can use the Free Harvard Citation Generator website for references arrangement. (https://www.citethisforme.com/citation-generator/harvard)

Citation in text:

Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Unpublished results and personal communications are not recommended in the reference list, but may be mentioned in the text. If these references are included in the reference list they should follow the standard reference style of the journal (Harvard style).

Publication’s ethics:

Authors are expected to present high standards to stringent guidelines about the most effective methods of publication. Inappropriate activities include but are not limited to the following: falsification or fabrication of data; plagiarism (>25%), including but not limited to the duplicate publishing of the authors' own work without proper reference; and theft of work. Any instances of unethical behavior or publishing misconduct are taken extremely seriously and will be handled in accordance with the recommendations made by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Refer to the OUP’s ethical policies (https://academic.oup.com/pages/authoring/journals/preparing_your_manuscript/ethics).